the nature of rent-第6部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！



price；　or　the　greater　quantity　of　capital　and　labour　which　must

be　employed　to　produce　it：　and　that　the　reason　why　the　real　price

of　corn　is　higher　and　continually　rising　in　countries　which　are

already　rich；　and　still　advancing　in　prosperity　and　population；

is　to　be　found　in　the　necessity　of　resorting　constantly　to　poorer

land　…　to　machines　which　require　a　greater　expenditure　to　work

them　…　and　which　consequently　occasion　each　fresh　addition　to　the

raw　produce　of　the　country　to　be　purchased　at　a　greater　cost　…　in

short；　it　is　to　be　found　in　the　important　truth　that　corn；　in　a

progressive　country；　is　sold　at　the　price　necessary　to　yield　the

actual　supply；　and　that；　as　this　supply　becomes　more　and　more

difficult；　the　price　rises　in　proportion。（14*）

　　　　The　price　of　corn；　as　determined　by　these　causes；　will　of

course　be　greatly　modified　by　other　circumstances；　by　direct　and

indirect　taxation；　by　improvements　in　the　modes　of　cultivation；

by　the　saving　of　labour　on　the　land；　and　particularly　by　the

importations　of　foreign　corn。　The　latter　cause；　indeed；　may　do

away；　in　a　considerable　degree；　the　usual　effects　of　great　wealth

on　the　price　of　corn；　and　this　wealth　will　then　show　itself　in　a

different　form。

　　　　Let　us　suppose　seven　or　eight　large　countries　not　very

distant　from　each　other；　and　not　very　differently　situated　with

regard　to　the　mines。　Let　us　suppose　further；　that　neither　their

soils　nor　their　skill　in　agriculture　are　essentially　unlike；　that

their　currencies　are　in　a　natural　state；　their　taxes　nothing；　and

that　every　trade　is　free；　except　the　trade　in　corn。　Let　us　now

suppose　one　of　them　very　greatly　to　increase　in　capital　and

manufacturing　skill　above　the　rest；　and　to　become　in　consequence

much　more　rich　and　populous。　I　should　say；　that　this　great

comparative　increase　of　riches　could　not　possibly　take　place；

without　a　great　comparative　advance　in　the　price　of　raw　produce；

and　that　such　advance　of　price　would；　under　the　circumstances

supposed；　be　the　natural　sign　and　absolutely　necessary

consequence；　of　the　increased　wealth　and　population　of　the

country　in　question。

　　　　Let　us　now　suppose　the　same　countries　to　have　the　most

perfect　freedom　of　intercourse　in　corn；　and　the　expenses　of

freight；　etc。　to　be　quite　inconsiderable。　And　let　us　still

suppose　one　of　them　to　increase　very　greatly　above　the　rest；　in

manufacturing　capital　and　skill；　in　wealth　and　population。　I

should　then　say；　that　as　the　importation　of　corn　would　prevent

any　great　difference　in　the　price　of　raw　produce；　it　would

prevent　any　great　difference　in　the　quantity　of　capital　laid　out

upon　the　land；　and　the　quantity　of　corn　obtained　from　it；　that；

consequently；　the　great　increase　of　wealth　could　not　take　place

without　a　great　dependence　on　the　other　nations　for　corn；　and

that　this　dependence；　under　the　circumstances　supposed；　would　be

the　natural　sign；　and　absolutely　necessary　consequence　of　the

increased　wealth　and　population　of　the　country　in　question。

　　　　These　I　consider　as　the　two　alternatives　necessarily

belonging　to　a　great　comparative　increase　of　wealth；　and　the

supposition　here　made　will；　with　proper　restrictions；　apply　to

the　state　of　Europe。

　　　　In　Europe；　the　expenses　attending　the　carriage　of　corn　are

often　considerable。　They　form　a　natural　barrier　to　importation；

and　even　the　country　which　habitually　depends　upon　foreign　corn；

must　have　the　price　of　its　raw　produce　considerably　higher　than

the　general　level。　Practically；　also；　the　prices　of　raw　produce；

in　the　different　countries　of　Europe；　will　be　variously　modified

by　very　different　soils；　very　different　degrees　of　taxation；　and

very　different　degrees　of　improvement　in　the　science　of

agriculture。　Heavy　taxation；　and　a　poor　soil；　may　occasion　a　high

comparative　price　of　raw　produce；　or　a　considerable　dependence　on

other　countries；　without　great　wealth　and　population；　while　great

improvements　in　agriculture　and　a　good　soil　may　keep　the　price　of

produce　low；　and　the　country　independent　of　foreign　corn；　in

spite　of　considerable　wealth。　But　the　principles　laid　down　are

the　general　principles　on　the　subject；　and　in　applying　them　to

any　particular　case；　the　particular　circumstances　of　such　case

must　always　be　taken　into　consideration。

　　　　With　regard　to　improvements　in　agriculture；　which　in　similar

soils　is　the　great　cause　which　retards　the　advance　of　price

compared　with　the　advance　of　produce；　although　they　are　sometimes

very　powerful；　they　are　rarely　found　sufficient　to　balance　the

necessity　of　applying　to　poorer　land；　or　inferior　machines。　In

this　respect；　raw　produce　is　essentially　different　from

manufactures。

　　　　The　real　price　of　manufactures；　the　quantity　of　labour　and

capital　necessary　to　produce　a　given　quantity　of　them；　is　almost

constantly　diminishing；　while　the　quantity　of　labour　and　capital；

necessary　to　procure　the　last　addition　that　has　been　made　to　the

raw　produce　of　a　rich　and　advancing　country；　is　almost　constantly

increasing。　We　see　in　consequence；　that　in　spite　of　continued

improvements　in　agriculture；　the　money　price　of　corn　is　ceteris

paribus　the　highest　in　the　richest　countries；　while　in　spite　of

this　high　price　of　corn；　and　consequent　high　price　of　labour；　the

money　price　of　manufactures　still　continues　lower　than　in　poorer

countries。

　　　　I　cannot　then　agree　with　Adam　Smith；　in　thinking　that　the　low

value　of　gold　and　silver　is　no　proof　of　the　wealth　and

flourishing　state　of　the　country；　where　it　takes　place。　Nothing

of　course　can　be　inferred　from　it；　taken　absolutely；　except　the

abundance　of　the　mines；　but　taken　relatively；　or　in　comparison

with　the　state　of　other　countries；　much　may　be　inferred　from　it。

If　we　are　to　measure　the　value　of　the　precious　metals　in

different　countries；　and　at　different　periods　in　the　same

country；　by　the　price　of　corn　and　labour；　which　appears　to　me　to

be　the　nearest　practical　approximation　that　can　be　adopted　（and

in　fact　corn　is　the　measure　used　by　Adam　Smith　himself）；　it

appears　to　me　to　follow；　that　in　countries　which　have　a　frequent

commercial　intercourse　with　each　other；　which　are　nearly　at　the

same　distance　from　the　mines；　and　are　not　essentially　different

in　soil；　there　is　no　more　certain　sign；　or　more　necessary

consequence　of　superiority　of　wealth；　than　the　low　value　of　the

precious　metals；　or　the　high　price　of　raw　produce。（15*）

　　　　It　is　of　importance　to　ascertain　this　point；　that　we　may　not

complain　of　one　of　the　most　certain　proofs　of　the　prosperous

condition　of　a　country。

　　　　It　is　not　of　course　meant　to　be　asserted；　that　the　high　price

of　raw　produce　is；　separately　taken；　advantageous　to　the

consumer；　but　that　it　is　the　necessary　concomitant　of　superior

and　increasing　wealth；　and　that　one　of　them　cannot　be　had　without

the　other。（16*）

　　　　With　regard　to　the　labouring　classes　of　society；　whose

interests　as　consumers　may　be　supposed　to　be　most　nearly

concerned；　it　is　a　very　short…sighted　view　of　the　subject；　which

contemplates；　with　alarm；　the　high　price　of　corn　as　certainly

injurious　to　them。　The　essentials　to　their　well　being　are　their

own　prudential　habits；　and　the　increasing　demand　for　labour。　And

I　do　not　scruple　distinctly　to　affirm；　that　under　similar　habits；

and　a　similar　demand　for　labour；　the　high　price　of　corn；　when　it

has　had　time　to　produce　its　natural　effects；　so　far　from　being　a

disadvantage　to　them；　is　a　positive　and　unquestionable　advantage。

To　supply　the　same　demand　for　labour；　the　necessary　price　of

production　must　be　paid；　and　they　must　be　able　to　command　the

same　quantities　of　the　necessaries　of　life；　whether　they　are　high

or　low　in　price。（17*）　But　if　they　are　able　to　command　the　same

quantity　of　necessaries；　and　receive　a　money　price　for　their

labour；　proportioned　to　their　advanced　price；　there　is　no　doubt

that；　with　regard　to　all　the　objects　of　convenience　and　comfort；

which　do　not　rise　in　proportion　to　corn　（and　there　are　many　such

consumed　by　the　poor）；　their　condition　will　be　most　decidedly

improved。

　　　　The　reader　will　observe　in　what　manner　I　have　guarded　the

proposition。　I　am　well　aware；　and　indeed　have　myself　stated　in

another　place；　that　the　price　of　provisions　often　rises；　without

a　proportionate　rise　of　labour：　but　this　cannot　possibly　happen

for　any　length　of　time；　if　the　demand　for　labour　continues

increasing　at　the　same　rate；　and　the　habits　of　the　labourer　are

not　altered；　either　with　regard　to　prudence；　or　the　quantity　of

work　which　he　is　disposed　to　perform。

　　　　The　peculiar　evil　to　be　apprehended　is；　that　the　high　money

price　of　labour　may　diminish　the　demand　for　it；　and　that　it　has

this　tendency　will　be　readily　allowed；　particularly　as　it　tends

to　increase　the　prices　of　exportable　commodities。　But　repeated

experience　has　shown　us　that　such　tendencies　are　continually

counterbalanced；　and　more　than　counterbalanced　by　other

circumstances。　And　we　have　witnessed；　in　our　own　country；　a

greater　and　more　rapid　extension　of　foreign　commerce；　than

perhaps　was　ever　known；　under　the　apparent　disadvantage　of　a　very

great　increase　in　the　price　of　corn　and　labour；　compared　with　the

prices　of　surrounding　countries。

　　　　On　the　other　hand；　instances　everywhere　abound　of　a　very　low

money　price　of　labour；　totally　failing　to　produce　an　increasing

demand　for　it。　And　among　the　labouring　classes　of　different

countries；　none　certainly　are　so　wretched　as　those；　where　the

demand　for　labour；　and　the　population　are　stationary；　and　yet　the

prices　of　provisions　extremely　low；　compared　with　manufactures

and　foreign　commodities。　However　low　they　may　be；　it　is　certain；

that　under　such　circumstances；　no　more　will　fall　to　the　share　of

the　labourer　than　is　necessary　just　to　maintain　the　actual

population；　and　his　condition　will　be　depressed；　not　only　by　the

stationary　demand　for　labour；　but　by　the　additional　evil　of　being

able　to　command　but　a　small　portion　of　manufact