labour defended against the claims of capital-第2部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！


Economy；　Preface；　p。　1；　2nd　Ed。）
　　　　　〃It　is　self…evident；〃　says　Mr　M'Culloch；　〃that　only　three
classes；　the　labourers；　the　possessors　of　capital；　and　the
proprietors　of　land；　are　ever　directly　concerned　in　the
production　of　commodities。　It　is　to　them；　therefore；　that　all
which　is　derived　from　the　surface　of　the　earth；　or　from　its
bowels；　by　the　united　application　of　immediate　labour；　and　of
capital；　or　accumulated　labour；　must　primarily　belong。　The　other
classes　of　society　have　no　revenue　except　what　they　derive　either
voluntarily　or　by　compulsion　from　these　three　classes。〃
　　　　　The　proportions　in　which　the　whole　produce　is　divided　among
these　three　classes　is　said　to　be　as　follows：　　〃Land　is　of
different　degrees　of　fertility。〃　〃When；　in　the　progress　of
society；　land　of　the　second　quality　（or　an　inferior　degree　of
fertility　to　land　before　cultivated）　is　taken　into　cultivation；
rent　immediately　commences　on　that　of　the　first　quality；　and　the
amount　of　that　rent　will　depend　on　the　difference　in　the　quality；
and　the　amount　of　that　rent　will　depend　on　the　difference　in　the
quality　of　these　two　portions　or　land。〃　＇Principles　of　Political
Economy＇　Rent；　therefore；　or　that　quantity　of　the　whole　produce
of　the　country　which　goes　to　the　landlords；　is；　in　every　stage　of
society；　that　portion　of　this　produce　which　is　obtained　from
every　district　belonging　to　a　politically　organized　nation；　more
than　is　obtained　from　the　least　fertile　land　cultivated　by；　or
belonging　to；　that　nation。　It　is　the　greater　produce　of　all　the
land　which　is　more　fertile　than　the　least　fertile　land
cultivated。　To　produce　this　surplus　would　not　break　the　back；　and
to　give　it　up　would　not　break　the　heart　of　the　labourer。　The
landlord's　share；　therefore；　does　not　keep　the　labourer　poor。
　　　　　The　labourer's　share　of　the　produce　of　a　country；　according
to　this　theory；　is　the　〃necessaries　and　conveniences　required　for
the　support　of　the　labourer　and　his　family；　or　that　quantity
which　is　necessary　to　enable　the　labourers；　one　with　another；　to
subsist　and　to　perpetuate　their　race；　without　either　increase　or
diminution。〃　Whatever　may　be　the　truth　of　the　theory　in　other
respects；　there　is　no　doubt　of　its　correctness　in　this
particular。　The　labourers　do　only　receive；　and　ever　have　only
received；　as　much　as　will　subsist　them；　the　landlords　receive　the
surplus　produce　of　the　more　fertile　soils；　and　all　the　rest　of
the　whole　produce　of　labour　in　this　and　in　every　country　goes　to
the　capitalist　under　the　name　of　profit　for　the　use　of　his
capital。
　　　　　Capital　which　thus　engrosses　the　whole　produce　of　a　country；
except　the　bare　subsistence　of　the　labourer；　and　the　surplus
produce　of　fertile　land；　is；　〃the　produce　of　labour；〃　〃is
commodities；〃　〃is　the　food　the　labourer　eats；　and　the　machines　he
uses〃：　so　that　we　are　obliged　to　give　that　enormous　portion　of
the　whole　produce　of　the　country　which　remains；　after　we　have
been　supplied　with　subsistence；　and　the　rent　of　the　landlord　has
been　paid；　for　the　privilege　of　eating　the　food　we　have　ourselves
produced；　and　of　using　our　own　skill　in　producing　more。　Capital；
the　reader　will　suppose；　must　have　some　wonderful　properties；
when　the　labourer　pays　so　exorbitantly　for　it。　In　fact；　its
claims　are　founded　on　its　wonderful　properties；　and　to　them；
therefore；　I　mean　especially　to　direct　his　attention。
　　　　　Several　good　and　great　men；　whom　we　must　all　respect　and
esteem；　seeing　that　capital　did　obtain　all　the　large　share　I　have
mentioned；　and　being　more　willing；　apparently；　to　defend　and　to
explain　the　present　order　of　society　than　to　ascertain　whether　it
could　be　improved；　have　endeavoured　to　point　out　the　method　in
which　capital　aids　production。　From　their　writings　I　shall
extract　some　passages　explanatory　of　its　effects。　I　must；
however；　beg　not　to　be　understood　as　doing　this　invidiously。　The
only　motive　I　have　for　selecting　these　authors；　as　the
representatives　of　the　political　economists；　is；　that　they　are　by
far　the　more　efficient　and　eloquent　supporters　of　the　doctrine　I
do　not　assent　to。
　　　　　　Mr　M'Culloch　says：　〃The　accumulation　and　employment　of　both
fixed　and　circulating　capital　is　indispensably　necessary　to
elevate　any　nation　in　the　scale　of　civilization。　And　it　is　only
by　their　conjoined　and　powerful　operation　that　wealth　can　be
largely　produced　and　universally　diffused。〃　＇Article　〃Political
Economy〃　in　Supplement　to　Encyclopedia　Britannica。＇
　　　　　〃The　quantity　of　industry；〃　he　further　says；　〃therefore　not
only　increases　in　every　country　with　the　increase　of　the　stock　or
capital　which　sets　it　in　motion；　but；　in　consequence　of　this
increase；　the　division　of　labour　becomes　extended；　new　and　more
powerful　implements　and　machines　are　invented；　and　the　same
quantity　of　labour　is　thus　made　to　produce　an　infinitely　greater
quantity　of　commodities。
　　　　　〃Besides　its　effect　in　enabling　labour　to　be　divided；
capital　contributes　to　facilitate　labour；　and　produce　wealth　in
the　three　following　ways：
　　　　　〃First。　　It　enables　us　to　execute　work　that　could　not　be
executed；　or　to　produce　commodities　that　could　not　be　produced
without　it。
　　　　　〃Second。　　It　saves　labour　in　the　production　of　almost
every　species　of　commodities。
　　　　　〃Third。　　It　enables　us　to　execute　work　better；　as　well　as
more　expeditiously。〃
　　　　　Mr　Mill's　account　of　these　effects；　though　not　so　precise；
is　still　more　astounding。　〃The　labourer；〃　he　says；　〃has　neither
raw　materials　nor　tools。　These　are　provided　for　him　by　the
capitalist。　For　making　this　provision　the　capitalist　of　course
expects　a　reward。〃　According　to　this　statement；　the　capitalist
provides　for　the　labourer　and　only；　therefore；　expects　a　profit。
In　other　parts　of　his　book　it　is　not　the　capitalist　who　provides；
but　the　capital　which　works。　He　speaks　of　capital　as　an
instrument　of　production　co…operating　with　labour；　as　an　active
agent　combining　with　labour　to　produce　commodities；　and　thus　he
satisfies　himself；　and　endeavours　to　prove　to　the　reader　that
capital　is　entitled　to　all　that　large　share　of　the　produce　it
actually　receives。　He　also　attributes　to　capital　power　of
accumulation。　This　power　or　tendency　to　accumulate；　he　adds；　is
not　so　great　as　the　tendency　of　population　to　augment　　and　on
the　difference　between　these　two　tendencies　he　and　other　authors
have　erected　a　theory　of　society　which　places　poor　Mother　Nature
in　no　favourable　light。
　　　　　Without　troubling　myself　to　quote　more　passages　from　these
authors；　or　to　transcribe　the　opinion　of　other　writers；　I　shall
proceed　to　examine　the　effects　of　capital；　and　I　shall　begin　with
circulating　capital。　Mr　M'Culloch　says；　〃without　circulating
capital；〃　meaning　the　food　the　labourer　consumes；　and　the
clothing　he　wears；　〃the　labourer　never　could　engage　in　any
undertaking　which　did　not　yield　an　almost　immediate　return。〃
Afterwards　he　says；　〃that　division　of　labour　is　a　consequence　of
previous　accumulation　of　capital；〃　and　quotes　the　following
passage　from　Dr　Smith；　as　a　proper　expression　for　his　own
opinions：
　　　　　〃Before　labour　can　be　divided；　'a　stock　of　goods　of
different　kinds　must　be　stored　up　somewhere；　sufficient　to
maintain　the　labourer；　and　to　supply　him　with　tools　for　carrying
on　his　work。　A　weaver；　for　example；　could　not　apply　himself
entirely　to　his　peculiar　business；　unless　there　was　beforehand
stored　up　somewhere；　either　in　his　own　possession；　or　in　that　of
some　other　person；　a　stock　sufficient　for　his　maintenance；　and
for　supplying　him　with　the　materials　and　implements　required　to
carry　on　his　work；　till　he　has　not　only　completed；　but　sold　his
web。　This　accumulation　must　evidently　be　previous　to　his　applying
himself　for　so　long　a　time　to　a　peculiar　business。'〃
　　　　　The　only　advantage　of　circulating　capital　is　that　by　it　the
labourer　is　enabled；　he　being　assured　of　his　present　subsistence；
to　direct　his　power　to　the　greatest　advantage。　He　has　time　to
learn　an　art；　and　his　labour　is　rendered　more　productive　when
directed　by　skill。　Being　assured　of　immediate　subsistence；　he　can
ascertain　which；　with　his　peculiar　knowledge　and　acquirements；
and　with　reference　to　the　wants　of　society；　is　the　best　method　of
labouring；　and　he　can　labour　in　this　manner。　Unless　there　were
this　assurance　there　could　be　no　continuous　thought；　an
invention；　and　no　knowledge　but　that　which　would　be　necessary　for
the　supply　of　our　immediate　animal　wants。　The　weaver；　I　admit；
could　not　complete　his　web；　nor　would　the　shipwright　begin　to
build　his　ship；　unless　he　knew　that　while　he　was　engaged　in　this
labour　he　should　be　able　to　procure　food。　A　merchant　certainly
could　not　set　out　for　South　America　or　the　East　Indies　unless　he
were　confident　that　during　the　period　of　his　absence　he　and　his
family　could　find　subsistence；　and　that　he　would　be　able　at　the
end　of　his　voyage　to　pay　all　the　expenses　he　had　incurred。　It　is
this　assurance；　this　knowledge；　this　confidence　of　obtaining
subsistence　and　reward；　which　enables　and　induces　men　to
undertake　long　and　complicated　operations；　and　the　question　is；
do　men　derive　this　assurance　from　a　stock　of　goods　already
provided　（saved　from　the　produce　of　previous　labour）　and　ready　to
pay　them；　or　from　any　other　source？
　　　　　I　SHALL　ENDEAVOUR　TO　SHOW　THAT　THIS　ASSURANCE　ARISES　FROM　A
GENERAL　PRINCIPLE　IN　THE　CONSTITUTION　OF　MAN；　AND　THAT　THE
EFFECTS　ATTRIBUTED　TO　A　STOCK　OF　COMMODITIES；　UNDER　THE　NAME　OF
CIRCULATING　CAPITAL；　ARE　CAUSED　BY　CO…EXISTING　LABOUR。
　　　　　The　labourer；　the　real　maker　of　any　commodity；　derives　this
assurance　from　a　knowledge　he　has　that　the　person　who　set　him　to
work　will　pay　him；　and　that　with　the　money　he　will　be　able　to　buy
what　he　requires。　He　is　not　in　possession　of　any　stock　of
commodities。　Has　the　person　who　employs　and　pays　him　such　a
stock？　Clearly　not。　Only　a　very　few　capitalists　possess　any　of
those　commodities　which　the　labourers　they　employ　consume。
Farmers　may　have　a　stock　of　corn；　and　merchants　and　shipowners
may　have　a　few　weeks'　or　months'　supply　of　provisions　for　their
seamen；　according　to　the　length　of　the　voyage　they　are　to
undertake；　but；　beyond　this；　no　capitalist　possesses　ready
prepared　the　commodities　which　his　labourers　require。　He
possesses　money；