lect02-第4部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！








weather　on　his　country。　The　development　of　the　Brehon　law　was






again　parallel　to　that　which　there　is　strong　reason　for　supposing






the　Roman　law　to　have　allowed　in　early　times。　The　writer　of　the






Preface　to　the　Third　Volume；　from　which　I　have　more　than　once






quoted；　cites　some　observations　which　I　published　several　years






ago　on　the　subject　of　the　extension　of　the　Roman　jurisprudence　by






the　agency　known　as　the　Responsa　Prudentum；　the　accumulated






answers　（or；　as　the　Brehon　phrase　is；　the　judgments）　of　many






successive　generations　of　famous　Roman　lawyers；　and　he　adopts　my






account　as　giving　the　most　probable　explanation　of　the　growth　of






the　Brehon　law。　But　in　the　Roman　State　a　test　was　always　applied






to　the　'answers　of　the　learned；'　which　was　not　applied；　or　not






systematically　applied；　to　the　judgments　of　the　Brehons。　We　never






know　the　Romans　except　as　subject　to　one　of　the　strongest　of






central　governments；　which　armed　the　law　courts　with　the　force　at






its　command。　Although　the　Roman　system　did　not　work　exactly　in






the　way　to　which　our　English　experience　has　accustomed　us；　there






can；　of　course；　be　no　doubt　that　the　ultimate　criterion　of　the






validity　of　professional　legal　opinion　at　Rome；　as　elsewhere；　was






the　action　of　Courts　of　Justice　enforcing　rights　and　duties　in






conformity　with　such　opinion。　But　in　ancient　Ireland　it　is　at






least　doubtful　whether　there　was　ever；　in　our　sense　of　the　words；






a　central　government；　it　is　also　doubtful　whether　the　public






force　at　the　command　of　any　ruler　or　rulers　was　ever






systematically　exerted　through　the　mechanism　of　Courts　of






Justice；　and　it　is　at　least　a　tenable　view　that　the　institutions






which　stood　in　the　place　of　Courts　of　Justice　only　exercised






jurisdiction　through　the　voluntary　submission　of　intending






litigants。






　　　　Perhaps；　however；　from　our　present　point　of　view；　the






strongest　contrast　is　between　the　ancient　law　of　Ireland　and　the






law　of　England　at　a　period　which　an　English　lawyer　would　not　call






recent。　The　administration　of　justice　in　England；　from






comparatively　early　times；　has　been　more　strongly　centralised






than　in　any　other　European　country；　but　in　Ireland　there　was　no






central　government　to　nerve　the　arm　of　the　law。　The　process　of






the　English　Courts　has　for　centuries　past　been　practically






irresistible；　the　process　of　the　Irish　Courts；　even　if　it　was






compulsory；　was　at　the　utmost　extremely　weak。　The　Irish　law　was






developed　by　hereditary　commentators；　but　we　in　England　have






always　attributed　far　less　authority　than　does　any　European






Continental　community　to　the　unofficial　commentaries　of　the　most






learned　writers　of　textbooks。　We　obtain　our　law；　and　adjust　it　to






the　needs　of　each　successive　generation；　either　through






legislative　enactment　or　through　the　decisions　of　our　judges　on






isolated　groups　of　facts　established　by　the　most　laborious






methods。　But；　as　I　have　already　stated；　the　opinion　to　which　I






incline　is；　that　no　part　of　the　Brehon　law　had　its　origin　in






legislation。　The　author　of　innovation　and　improvement　was　the






learned　Brehon；　and　the　Brehon　appears　to　have　invented　at






pleasure　the　facts　which　he　used　as　the　framework　for　his　legal






doctrine。　His　invention　was　necessarily　limited　by　his






experience；　and　hence　the　cases　suggested　in　the　law…tracts






possess　great　interest；　as　throwing　light　on　the　society　amid






which　they　were　composed；　but　these　cases　seem　to　be　purely






hypothetical；　and　only　intended　to　illustrate　the　rule　which






happens　to　be　under　discussion。






　　　　In　the　volume　of　my　own　to　which　I　referred　a　few　moments　ago






I　said　of　the　early　Roman　law　that　'great　influence　must　have






been　exercised　（over　it）　by　the　want　of　any　distinct　check　on　the






suggestion　or　invention　of　possible　questions。　When　the　data　can






be　multiplied　at　pleasure；　the　facilities　for　evolving　a　general






rule　are　immensely　increased。　As　the　law　is　administered　among






ourselves　（in　England）　the　judge　cannot　travel　out　of　the　sets　of






facts　exhibited　before　him　or　before　his　predecessors。






Accordingly；　each　group　of　circumstances　which　is　adjudicated






upon　receives；　to　employ　a　Gallicism；　a　sort　of　consecration。　It






acquires　certain　qualities　which　distinguish　it　from　every　other






case；　genuine　or　hypothetical。'　I　do　not　think　it　can　be　doubted






that　this　English　practice　of　never　declaring　a　legal　rule






authoritatively　until　a　state　of　facts　arises　to　which　it　can　be






fitted；　is　the　secret　of　the　apparent　backwardness　and　barrenness






of　English　law　at　particular　epochs；　as　contrasted　with　the






richness　and　reasonableness　of　other　systems　which　it　more　than






rivals　in　its　present　condition。　It　is　true；　as　I　said　before；






even　of　the　Brehon　law；　that　it　does　not　wholly　disappoint　the






patriotic　expectations　entertained　of　it。　When　they　are






disencumbered　of　archaic　phrase　and　form；　there　are　some　things






remarkably　modern　in　it。　I　quite　agree　with　one　of　the　Editors






that；　in　the　ancient　Irish　Law　of　Civil　Wrong；　there　is　a






singularly　close　approach　to　modern　doctrines　on　the　subject　of






Contributory　Negligence；　and　I　have　found　it　possible　to　extract






from　the　quaint　texts　of　the　Book　of　Aicill　some　extremely






sensible　rulings　on　the　difficult　subject　of　the　Measure　of






Damages；　for　which　it　would　be　vain　to　study　the　writings　of　Lord






Coke；　though　these　last　are　relatively　of　much　later　date。　But






the　Brehon　law　pays　heavily　for　this　apparent　anticipation　of　the






modern　legal　spirit。　It　must　be　confessed　that　most　of　it　has　a






strong　air　of　fancifulness　and　unreality。　It　seems　as　if　the






Brehon　lawyer；　after　forming　（let　us　say）　a　conception　of　a






particular　kind　of　injury；　set　himself；　as　a　sort　of　mental






exercise；　to　devise　all　the　varieties　of　circumstance　under　which






the　wrong　could　be　committed；　and　then　to　determine　the　way　in






which　some　traditional　principle　of　redress　could　be　applied　to






the　cases　supposed。　This　indulgence　of　his　imagination　drew　him






frequently　into　triviality　or　silliness；　and　led　to　an






extraordinary　multiplication　of　legal　detail。　Four　pages　of　the






Book　of　Aicill　（a　very　large　proportion　of　an　ancient　body　of






law）　are　concerned　with　injuries　received　from　dogs　in






dog…fights；　and　they　set　forth　in　the　most　elaborate　way　the






modification　of　the　governing　rule　required　in　the　case　of　the






owners　　in　the　case　of　the　spectators　　in　the　case　of　the






'impartial　interposer'　　in　the　case　of　the　'half…interposer；'






i。　e。　the　man　who　tries　to　separate　the　dogs　with　a　bias　in






favour　of　one　of　them　　in　the　case　of　an　accidental　looker…on






　in　the　case　of　a　youth　under　age；　and　in　the　case　of　an　idiot。






The　same　law…tract　deals　also　with　the　curious　subjects　of






injuries　from　a　cat　stealing　in　a　kitchen；　from　women　using　their






distaffs　in　a　woman…battle；　and　from　bees；　a　distinction　being






drawn　between　the　case　in　which　the　sting　draws　blood　and　the






case　in　which　it　does　not。　Numberless　other　instances　could　be






given；　but　I　repeat　that　all　this　is　mixed　up　with　much　that　even






now　has　juridical　interest；　and　with　much　which　in　that　state　of






society　had　probably　the　greatest　practical　importance。






　　　　It　is　not；　perhaps；　as　often　noticed　as　it　should　be　by






English　writers　on　law　that　the　method　of　enunciating　legal






principles　with　which　our　Courts　of　Justice　have　familiarised　us






is　absolutely　peculiar　to　England　and　to　communities　under　the






direct　influence　of　English　practice。　In　all　Western　societies；






Legislation；　which　is　the　direct　issue　of　the　commands　of　the






sovereign　state；　tends　more　and　more　to　become　the　exclusive






source　of　law；　but　still　in　all　Continental　countries　other






authorities　of　various　kinds　are　occasionally　referred　to；　among






which　are　the　texts　of　the　Roman　Corpus　Juris；　commentaries　on






Codes　and　other　bodies　of　written　law；　the　unofficial　writings　of






famous　lawyers；　and　other　branches　of　the　vast　literature　of　law






holding　at　most　a　secondary　place　in　the　estimation　of　the






English　Judges　and　Bar。　Nowhere；　however；　is　anything　like　the






same　dignity　as　with　us　attributed　to　a　decided　'case；'　and　I






have　found　it　difficult　to　make　foreign　lawyers　understand　why






their　English　brethren　should　bow　so　implicitly　to　what　Frenchmen






term　the　'jurisprudence'　of　a　particular　tribunal。　From　one　point






of　view　English　law　has　doubtless　suffered　through　this






reluctance　to　invent　or　imagine　facts　aS　the　groundwork　of　rules；






and　it　will　continue　to　bear　the　marks　of　the　injury　until






legislative　re…arrangement　and　re…statement　fully　disclose　the






stores　of　common　sense　which　are　at　present　concealed　by　its






defects　of　language　and　form。　On　the　other　hand；　these　habits　of






the　English　Co