友情提示:如果本网页打开太慢或显示不完整,请尝试鼠标右键“刷新”本网页!
合租小说网 返回本书目录 加入书签 我的书架 我的书签 TXT全本下载 『收藏到我的浏览器』

lect02-第7部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完,想下次继续接着阅读,可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能!








stringent Paternal Power。 He; a Roman; familiar with a Patria






Potestas as yet undecayed; thinks it worthy of remark that the






head of a Gallic household had the power of life and death over






his wives as well as his children; and notices with astonishment






that; when a husband died under suspicious circumstances; his






wives were treated with the same cruelty as a body of household






slaves at Rome whose master had been killed by an unknown hand。






(B。 G。; vi。 19。) Now; though very much cannot be confidently said






about the transition (which; nevertheless; is an undoubted fact)






of many societies from polygamy to monogamy under influences






other than those of religion; it may plausibly be conjectured






that here and there it had its cause in liberty of divorce。 The






system which permitted a plurality of wives may have passed into






the system which forbade more than one wife at a time; but which






did not go farther。 The monogamy of the modern and Western world






is; in fact; the monogamy of the Romans; from which the license






of divorce has been expelled by Christian morality。 There are






hardly any materials for an opinion upon the degree of influence






exercised by the Church over the transformation of






marriage…relations in Ireland; but there are several indications






that the ecclesiastical rules as to the conditions of a valid






marriage established themselves very slowly among the ruder races






on the outskirts of what had been the Roman Empire。 Mr Burton






('History of Scotland;' ii。 213); in speaking of the number of






illegitimate claimants who brought their pretensions to the Crown






of Scotland before Edward the First; observes: 'That they should






have pushed their claims only shows that the Church had not yet






absolutely established the rule that from her and her ceremony






and sacrament could alone come the union capable of transmitting






a right of succession to offspring。' The tract on 'Social






Connexions' notices a 'first' wife; and the recognition may be






attributable to the Church; but on the whole my impression






certainly is that the extremely ascetic form under which






Christianity was introduced into Ireland was unfavourable to its






obtaining a hold on popular morality。 The common view seems to






have been that chastity was the professional virtue of a special






class; for the Brehon tracts; which make the assumptions I have






described as to the morals of the laity; speak of irregularity of






life in a monk or bishop with the strongest reprobation and






disgust。 At the present moment Ireland is probably the one of all






Western countries in which the relations of the sexes are most






nearly on the footing required by the Christian theory; nor is






there any reasonable doubt that this result has been brought






about in the main by the Roman Catholic clergy。 But this






purification of morals was effected during the period through






which monks and monasticism were either expelled from Ireland or






placed under the ban of the law。






    I will take this opportunity of saying that the influence of






Christianity on a much more famous system than the Brehon law has






always seemed to me to be greatly overstated by M。 Troplong and






other well…known juridical writers。 There is; of course; evidence






of Christian influence on Roman law in the disabilities imposed






on various classes of heretics and in the limitations of that






liberty of divorce which belonged to the older jurisprudence。






But; even in respect of divorce; the modifications strike me as






less than might have been expected from what we know of the






condition of opinion in the Roman world; and; as regards certain






improvements said to have been introduced by Christianity into






the Imperial law of slavery; they were probably quickened by its






influence; but they began in principles which were of Stoical






rather than of Christian origin。 I do not question the received






opinion that Christianity greatly mitigated and did much to






abolish personal and predial slavery in the West; but the






Continental lawyers of whom I spoke considerably antedate its






influence; and take far too little account of the prodigious






effects subsequently produced by the practical equality of all






men within the pale of the Catholic priesthood。 But I principally






deprecate these statements; which in some countries have almost






become professional commonplaces; for two reasons。 They slur over






a very instructive fact; the great unmalleability of all bodies






of law。 and they obscure an interesting and yet unsettled;






problem; the origin of the Canon law。 The truth seems to be that






the Imperial Roman law did not satisfy the morality of the






Christian communities; and this is the most probable reason why






another body of rules grew up by its side and ultimately almost






rivalled it。















返回目录 上一页 回到顶部 0 0
快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
温馨提示: 温看小说的同时发表评论,说出自己的看法和其它小伙伴们分享也不错哦!发表书评还可以获得积分和经验奖励,认真写原创书评 被采纳为精评可以获得大量金币、积分和经验奖励哦!