areopagitica-第2部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！



at　that　ethereal　and　fifth　essence；　the　breath　of　reason　itself；

slays　an　immortality　rather　than　a　life。　　But　lest　I　should　be

condemned　of　introducing　license；　while　I　oppose　licensing；　I

refuse　not　the　pains　to　be　so　much　historical；　as　will　serve　to

show　what　hath　been　done　by　ancient　and　famous　commonwealths

against　this　disorder；　till　the　very　time　that　this　project　of

licensing　crept　out　of　the　Inquisition；　was　catched　up　by　our

prelates；　and　hath　caught　some　of　our　presbyters。



In　Athens；　where　books　and　wits　were　ever　busier　than　in　any

other　part　of　Greece；　I　find　but　only　two　sorts　of　writings　which

the　magistrate　cared　to　take　notice　of；　those　either　blasphemous

and　atheistical；　or　libellous。　　Thus　the　books　of　Protagoras　were

by　the　judges　of　Areopagus　commanded　to　be　burnt；　and　himself

banished　the　territory　for　a　discourse　begun　with　his　confessing

not　to　know　WHETHER　THERE　WERE　GODS；　OR　WHETHER　NOT。　　And

against　defaming；　it　was　decreed　that　none　should　be　traduced　by

name；　as　was　the　manner　of　Vetus　Comoedia；　whereby　we　may　guess　how

they　censured　libelling。　　And　this　course　was　quick　enough；　as

Cicero　writes；　to　quell　both　the　desperate　wits　of　other　atheists；

and　the　open　way　of　defaming；　as　the　event　showed。　　Of　other　sects

and　opinions；　though　tending　to　voluptuousness；　and　the　denying　of

divine　Providence；　they　took　no　heed。



Therefore　we　do　not　read　that　either　Epicurus；　or　that　libertine

school　of　Cyrene；　or　what　the　Cynic　impudence　uttered；　was　ever

questioned　by　the　laws。　　Neither　is　it　recorded　that　the　writings

of　those　old　comedians　were　suppressed；　though　the　acting　of　them

were　forbid；　and　that　Plato　commended　the　reading　of　Aristophanes；

the　loosest　of　them　all；　to　his　royal　scholar　Dionysius；　is

commonly　known；　and　may　be　excused；　if　holy　Chrysostom；　as　is

reported；　nightly　studied　so　much　the　same　author　and　had　the　art

to　cleanse　a　scurrilous　vehemence　into　the　style　of　a　rousing

sermon。



That　other　leading　city　of　Greece；　Lacedaemon；　considering　that

Lycurgus　their　lawgiver　was　so　addicted　to　elegant　learning；　as　to

have　been　the　first　that　brought　out　of　Ionia　the　scattered　works

of　Homer；　and　sent　the　poet　Thales　from　Crete　to　prepare　and

mollify　the　Spartan　surliness　with　his　smooth　songs　and　odes；　the

better　to　plant　among　them　law　and　civility；　it　is　to　be　wondered

how　museless　and　unbookish　they　were；　minding　nought　but　the　feats

of　war。　　There　needed　no　licensing　of　books　among　them；　for　they

disliked　all　but　their　own　laconic　apophthegms；　and　took　a　slight

occasion　to　chase　Archilochus　out　of　their　city；　perhaps　for

composing　in　a　higher　strain　than　their　own　soldierly　ballads　and

roundels　could　reach　to。　　Or　if　it　were　for　his　broad　verses；　they

were　not　therein　so　cautious　but　they　were　as　dissolute　in　their

promiscuous　conversing；　whence　Euripides　affirms　in　　Andromache；

that　their　women　were　all　unchaste。　　Thus　much　may　give　us　light

after　what　sort　of　books　were　prohibited　among　the　Greeks。



The　Romans　also；　for　many　ages　trained　up　only　to　a　military

roughness　resembling　most　the　Lacedaemonian　guise；　knew　of　learning

little　but　what　their　twelve　Tables；　and　the　Pontific　College　with

their　augurs　and　flamens　taught　them　in　religion　and　law；　so

unacquainted　with　other　learning；　that　when　Carneades　and

Critolaus；　with　the　Stoic　Diogenes；　coming　ambassadors　to　Rome；

took　thereby　occasion　to　give　the　city　a　taste　of　their　philosophy；

they　were　suspected　for　seducers　by　no　less　a　man　than　Cato　the

Censor；　who　moved　it　in　the　Senate　to　dismiss　them　speedily；　and　to

banish　all　such　Attic　babblers　out　of　Italy。　　But　Scipio　and　others

of　the　noblest　senators　withstood　him　and　his　old　Sabine　austerity；

honoured　and　admired　the　men；　and　the　censor　himself　at　last；　in

his　old　age；　fell　to　the　study　of　that　whereof　before　he　was　so

scrupulous。　　And　yet　at　the　same　time　Naevius　and　Plautus；　the

first　Latin　comedians；　had　filled　the　city　with　all　the　borrowed

scenes　of　Menander　and　Philemon。　　Then　began　to　be　considered　there

also　what　was　to　be　done　to　libellous　books　and　authors；　for

Naevius　was　quickly　cast　into　prison　for　his　unbridled　pen；　and

released　by　the　tribunes　upon　his　recantation；　we　read　also　that

libels　were　burnt；　and　the　makers　punished　by　Augustus。　　The　like

severity；　no　doubt；　was　used；　if　aught　were　impiously　written

against　their　esteemed　gods。　　Except　in　these　two　points；　how　the

world　went　in　books；　the　magistrate　kept　no　reckoning。



And　therefore　Lucretius　without　impeachment　versifies　his

Epicurism　to　Memmius；　and　had　the　honour　to　be　set　forth　the　second

time　by　Cicero；　so　great　a　father　of　the　Commonwealth；　although

himself　disputes　against　that　opinion　in　his　own　writings。　　Nor　was

the　satirical　sharpness　or　naked　plainness　of　Lucilius；　or

Catullus；　or　Flaccus；　by　any　order　prohibited。　　And　for　matters　of

state；　the　story　of　Titus　Livius；　though　it　extolled　that　part

which　Pompey　held；　was　not　therefore　suppressed　by　Octavius　Caesar

of　the　other　faction。　　But　that　Naso　was　by　him　banished　in　his　old

age；　for　the　wanton　poems　of　his　youth；　was　but　a　mere　covert　of

state　over　some　secret　cause：　and　besides；　the　books　were　neither

banished　nor　called　in。　　From　hence　we　shall　meet　with　little　else

but　tyranny　in　the　Roman　empire；　that　we　may　not　marvel；　if　not　so

often　bad　as　good　books　were　silenced。　　I　shall　therefore　deem　to

have　been　large　enough；　in　producing　what　among　the　ancients　was

punishable　to　write；　save　only　which；　all　other　arguments　were　free

to　treat　on。



By　this　time　the　emperors　were　become　Christians；　whose

discipline　in　this　point　I　do　not　find　to　have　been　more　severe

than　what　was　formerly　in　practice。　　The　books　of　those　whom　they

took　to　be　grand　heretics　were　examined；　refuted；　and　condemned　in

the　general　Councils；　and　not　till　then　were　prohibited；　or　burnt；

by　authority　of　the　emperor。　　As　for　the　writings　of　heathen

authors；　unless　they　were　plain　invectives　against　Christianity；　as

those　of　Porphyrius　and　Proclus；　they　met　with　no　interdict　that

can　be　cited；　till　about　the　year　400；　in　a　Carthaginian　Council；

wherein　bishops　themselves　were　forbid　to　read　the　books　of

Gentiles；　but　heresies　they　might　read：　while　others　long　before

them；　on　the　contrary；　scrupled　more　the　books　of　heretics　than　of

Gentiles。　　And　that　the　primitive　Councils　and　bishops　were　wont

only　to　declare　what　books　were　not　commendable；　passing　no

further；　but　leaving　it　to　each　one's　conscience　to　read　or　to　lay

by；　till　after　the　year　800；　is　observed　already　by　Padre　Paolo；

the　great　unmasker　of　the　Trentine　Council。



After　which　time　the　Popes　of　Rome；　engrossing　what　they　pleased

of　political　rule　into　their　own　hands；　extended　their　dominion

over　men's　eyes；　as　they　had　before　over　their　judgments；　burning

and　prohibiting　to　be　read　what　they　fancied　not；　yet　sparing　in

their　censures；　and　the　books　not　many　which　they　so　dealt　with：

till　Martin　V。；　by　his　bull；　not　only　prohibited；　but　was　the　first

that　excommunicated　the　reading　of　heretical　books；　for　about　that

time　Wickliffe　and　Huss；　growing　terrible；　were　they　who　first

drove　the　Papal　Court　to　a　stricter　policy　of　prohibiting。　　Which

course　Leo　X。　and　his　successors　followed；　until　the　Council　of

Trent　and　the　Spanish　Inquisition　engendering　together　brought

forth；　or　perfected；　those　Catalogues　and　expurging　Indexes；　that

rake　through　the　entrails　of　many　an　old　good　author；　with　a

violation　worse　than　any　could　be　offered　to　his　tomb。　　Nor　did

they　stay　in　matters　heretical；　but　any　subject　that　was　not　to

their　palate；　they　either　condemned　in　a　Prohibition；　or　had　it

straight　into　the　new　purgatory　of　an　index。



To　fill　up　the　measure　of　encroachment；　their　last　invention　was

to　ordain　that　no　book；　pamphlet；　or　paper　should　be　printed　（as　if

St。　Peter　had　bequeathed　them　the　keys　of　the　press　also　out　of

Paradise）　unless　it　were　approved　and　licensed　under　the　hands　of

two　or　three　glutton　friars。　　For　example：





　　　Let　the　Chancellor　Cini　be　pleased　to　see　if　in　this　present

　　　　　　　　work　be　contained　aught　that　may　withstand　the　printing。



　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　VINCENT　RABBATTA；　　Vicar　of　Florence。



　　　I　have　seen　this　present　work；　and　find　nothing　athwart　the

　　　　　　　　Catholic　faith　and　good　manners：　in　witness　whereof　I

　　　　　　　　have　given；　etc。





　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　NICOLO　GINI；　　Chancellor　of　Florence。





　　　Attending　the　precedent　relation；　it　is　allowed　that　this

　　　　　　　　present　work　of　Davanzati　may　be　printed。





　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　VINCENT　RABBATTA；　　etc。





　　　It　may　be　printed；　July　15。



　　　　　　　　　　　　　FRIAR　SIMON　MOMPEI　D'AMELIA；

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Chancellor　of　the　Holy　Office　in　Florence。





Sure　they　have　a　conceit；　if　he　of　the　bottomless　pit　had　not

long　since　broke　prison；　that　this　quadruple　exorcism　would　bar　him

down。　　I　fear　their　next　design　will　be　to　get　into　their　custody

the　licensing　of　that　which　they　say　Claudius　intended；　but　went

not　through　with。　　Vouchsafe　to　see　another　of　their　forms；　the

Roman　stamp：





　　　Imprimatur；　If　it　seem　good　to　the　reverend　Master　of　the



　　　　　　　　Holy　Palace。





　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　BELCASTRO；　　Vicegerent。





　　　　Imprimatur；　Friar　Nicolo　Rodolphi；　Master　of　the　Holy　Palace。





Sometimes　five　Imprimaturs　are　seen　together　dialogue…wise　in　the

piazza　of　one　title…page；　complimenting　and　ducking　each　to　other

with　their　shaven　reverences；　whether　the　author；　who　stands　by　in

perplexity　at　the　foot　of　his　epistle；　shall　to　the　press　or　to　the

sponge。　　These　are　the　pretty　responsories；　these　are　the　dear

antiphonies；　that　so　bewitched　of　late　our　prelates　and　their

chaplains　with　the　goodly　echo　they　made；　and　besotted　us　to　the

gay　imitation　of　a　lordly　Imprimatur；　one　from　Lambeth　House；

ano