mr. gladstone and genesis-第6部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！



month。　The　stars　are；　as　it　were；　thrown　in。　And　nothing　can

more　sharply　mark　the　doctrinal　purpose　of　the　author；　than　the

manner　in　which　he　deals　with　the　heavenly　bodies；　which　the

Gentiles　identified　so　closely　with　their　gods；　as　if　they　were

mere　accessories　to　the　almanac。



Animals　come　next　in　order　of　creation；　and　the　general　notion

of　the　writer　seems　to　be　that　they　were　produced　by　the　medium

in　which　they　live；　that　is　to　say；　the　aquatic　animals　by　the

waters；　and　the　terrestrial　animals　by　the　land。　But　there　was　a

difficulty　about　flying　things；　such　as　bats；　birds；　and

insects。　The　cosmogonist　seems　to　have　had　no　conception　of

〃air〃　as　an　elemental　body。　His　〃elements〃　are　earth　and　water；

and　he　ignores　air　as　much　as　he　does　fire。　Birds　〃fly　above　the

earth　in　the　open　firmament〃　or　〃on　the　face　of　the　expanse〃　of

heaven。　They　are　not　said　to　fly　through　the　air。　The　choice　of

a　generative　medium　for　flying　things；　therefore；　seemed　to　lie

between　water　and　earth；　and；　if　we　take　into　account　the

conspicuousness　of　the　great　flocks　of　water…birds　and　the

swarms　of　winged　insects；　which　appear　to　arise　from　water；　I

think　the　preference　of　water　becomes　intelligible。　However；　I

do　not　put　this　forward　as　more　than　a　probable　hypothesis。

As　to　the　creation　of　aquatic　animals　on　the　fifth；　that　of　land

animals　on　the　sixth　day；　and　that　of　man　last　of　all；　I　presume

the　order　was　determined　by　the　fact　that　man　could　hardly

receive　dominion　over　the　living　world　before　it　existed；

and　that　the　〃cattle〃　were　not　wanted　until　he　was　about　to　make

his　appearance。　The　other　terrestrial　animals　would　naturally　be

associated　with　the　cattle。



The　absurdity　of　imagining　that　any　conception；　analogous　to

that　of　a　zoological　classification；　was　in　the　mind　of　the

writer　will　be　apparent；　when　we　consider　that　the　fifth　day's

work　must　include　the　zoologist's　Cetacea；　Sirenia；　and

seals；　all　of　which　are　Mammalia；　all　birds；　turtles；

sea…snakes　and；　presumably；　the　fresh　water　Reptilia　and

Amphibia；　with　the　great　majority　of　Invertebrata。



The　creation　of　man　is　announced　as　a　separate　act；　resulting

from　a　particular　resolution　of　Elohim　to　〃make　man　in　our

image；　after　our　likeness。〃　To　learn　what　this　remarkable　phrase

means　we　must　turn　to　the　fifth　chapter　of　Genesis；　the　work　of

the　same　writer。　〃In　the　day　that　Elohim　created　man；　in　the

likeness　of　Elohim　made　he　him；　male　and　female　created　he　them；

and　blessed　them　and　called　their　name　Adam　in　the　day　when　they

were　created。　And　Adam　lived　an　hundred　and　thirty　years　and

begat　a　son　in　his　own　likeness；　after　his　image；

and　called　his　name　Seth。〃　I　find　it　impossible　to　read　this

passage　without　being　convinced　that；　when　the　writer　says　Adam

was　made　in　the　likeness　of　Elohim；　he　means　the　same　sort　of

likeness　as　when　he　says　that　Seth　was　begotten　in　the　likeness

of　Adam。　Whence　it　follows　that　his　conception　of　Elohim　was

completely　anthropomorphic。



In　all　this　narrative　I　can　discover　nothing　which

differentiates　it；　in　principle；　from　other　ancient　cosmogonies；

except　the　rejection　of　all　gods；　save　the　vague；　yet

anthropomorphic；　Elohim；　and　the　assigning　to　them　anteriority

and　superiority　to　the　world。　It　is　as　utterly　irreconcilable

with　the　assured　truths　of　modern　science；　as　it　is　with　the

account　of　the　origin　of　man；　plants；　and　animals　given　by　the

writer　of　the　second　chief　constituent　of　the　Hexateuch　in　the

second　chapter　of　Genesis。　This　extraordinary　story　starts　with

the　assumption　of　the　existence　of　a　rainless　earth；　devoid　of

plants　and　herbs　of　the　field。　The　creation　of　living　beings

begins　with　that　of　a　solitary　man；　the　next　thing　that　happens

is　the　laying　out　of　the　Garden　of　Eden；　and　the　causing　the

growth　from　its　soil　of　every　tree　〃that　is　pleasant　to　the

sight　and　good　for　food〃；　the　third　act　is　the　formation　out　of

the　ground　of　〃every　beast　of　the　field；　and　every　fowl　of　the

air〃；　the　fourth　and　last；　the　manufacture　of　the　first　woman

from　a　rib；　extracted　from　Adam；　while　in　a　state

of　anaesthesia。



Yet　there　are　people　who　not　only　profess　to　take　this　monstrous

legend　seriously；　but　who　declare　it　to　be　reconcilable　with　the

Elohistic　account　of　the　creation！







FOOTNOTES





（1）　The　Nineteenth　Century；　1886。



（2）　Both　dolphins　and　dugongs　occur　in　the　Red　Sea；　porpoises

and　dolphins　in　the　Mediterranean；　so　that　the　〃Mosaic　writer〃

may　have　been　acquainted　with　them。



（3）　I　said　nothing　about　〃the　greater　number　of　schools　of　Greek

philosophy；〃　as　Mr。　Gladstone　implies　that　I　did；　but　expressly

spoke　of　the　〃founders　of　Greek　philosophy。〃



（4）　See　Heinze；　Die　Lehre　vom　Logos；　p。　9　et　seq。



（5）　Reprinted　in　Lay　Sermons；　Addresses；　and　Reviews；

1870。



（6）　〃Ancient；〃　doubtless；　but　his　antiquity　must　not　be

exaggerated。　For　example；　there　is　no　proof　that　the　〃Mosaic〃

cosmogony　was　known　to　the　Israelites　of　Solomon's　time。



（7）　When　Jeremiah　（iv。　23）　says；　〃I　beheld　the　earth；　and；　lo；

it　was　waste　and　void；〃　he　certainly　does　not　mean　to　imply　that

the　form　of　the　earth　was　less　definite；　or　its　substance　less

solid；　than　before。



（8）　In　looking　through　the　delightful　volume　recently　published

by　the　Astronomer…Royal　for　Ireland；　a　day　or　two　ago；　I　find

the　following　remarks　on　the　nebular　hypothesis；　which　I　should

have　been　glad　to　quote　in　my　text　if　I　had　known　them　sooner：



〃Nor　can　it　be　ever　more　than　a　speculation；　it　cannot　be

established　by　observation；　nor　can　it　be　proved　by　calculation。

It　is　merely　a　conjecture；　more　or　less　plausible；　but　perhaps

in　some　degree；　necessarily　true；　if　our　present　laws　of　heat；

as　we　understand　them；　admit　of　the　extreme　application　here

required；　and　if　the　present　order　of　things　has　reigned　for

sufficient　time　without　the　intervention　of　any　influence　at

present　known　to　us〃　（The　Story　of　the　Heavens；　p。　506）。



Would　any　prudent　advocate　base　a　plea；　either　for　or　against

revelation；　upon　the　coincidence；　or　want　of　coincidence；　of　the

declarations　of　the　latter　with　the　requirements　of　an

hypothesis　thus　guardedly　dealt　with　by　an　astronomical　expert？



（9）　Lectures　on　Evolution　delivered　in　New　York　（American

Addresses）。



（10）　Reuss；　L'Histoire　Sainte　et　la　Loi；　vol。　i；　p。　275。



（11）　For　the　sense　of　the　term　〃Elohim；〃　see　the　essay　entitled

〃The　Evolution　of　Theology〃　at　the　end　of　this　volume。



（12）　Perhaps　even　hippopotamuses　and　otters！











End