wealbk03-第4部分

快捷操作: 按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页 按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页 按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部! 如果本书没有阅读完，想下次继续接着阅读，可使用上方 "收藏到我的浏览器" 功能 和 "加入书签" 功能！


farmers　have　a　lease　for　a　term　of　years；　they　may　sometimes　find

it　for　their　interest　to　lay　out　part　of　their　capital　in　the

further　improvement　of　the　farm；　because　they　may　sometimes

expect　to　recover　it；　with　a　large　profit；　before　the　expiration

of　the　lease。　The　possession　even　of　such　farmers；　however；　was

long　extremely　precarious；　and　still　is　so　in　many　parts　of

Europe。　They　could　before　the　expiration　of　their　term　be　legally

outed　of　their　lease　by　a　new　purchaser；　in　England；　even　by　the

fictitious　action　of　a　common　recovery。　If　they　were　turned　out

illegally　by　the　violence　of　their　master；　the　action　by　which

they　obtained　redress　was　extremely　imperfect。　It　did　not　always

reinstate　them　in　the　possession　of　the　land；　but　gave　them

damages　which　never　amounted　to　the　real　loss。　Even　in　England；

the　country　perhaps　of　Europe　where　the　yeomanry　has　always　been

most　respected；　it　was　not　till　about　the　14th　of　Henry　VII　that

the　action　of　ejectment　was　invented；　by　which　the　tenant

recovers；　not　damages　only　but　possession；　and　in　which　his　claim

is　not　necessarily　concluded　by　the　uncertain　decision　of　a

single　assize。　This　action　has　been　found　so　effectual　a　remedy

that；　in　the　modern　practice；　when　the　landlord　has　occasion　to

sue　for　the　possession　of　the　land；　he　seldom　makes　use　of　the

actions　which　properly　belong　to　him　as　landlord；　the　Writ　of

Right　or　the　Writ　of　Entry；　but　sues　in　the　name　of　his　tenant　by

the　Writ　of　Ejectment。　In　England；　therefore；　the　security　of　the

tenant　is　equal　to　that　of　the　proprietor。　In　England；　besides；　a

lease　for　life　of　forty　shillings　a　year　value　is　a　freehold；　and

entitles　the　lessee　to　vote　for　a　Member　of　Parliament；　and　as　a

great　part　of　the　yeomanry　have　freeholds　of　this　kind；　the　whole

order　becomes　respectable　to　their　landlords　on　account　of　the

political　consideration　which　this　gives　them。　There　is；　I

believe；　nowhere　in　Europe；　except　in　England；　any　instance　of

the　tenant　building　upon　the　land　of　which　he　had　no　lease；　and

trusting　that　the　honour　of　his　landlord　would　take　no　advantage

of　so　important　an　improvement。　Those　laws　and　customs　so

favourable　to　the　yeomanry　have　perhaps　contributed　more　to　the

present　grandeur　of　England　than　all　their　boasted　regulations　of

commerce　taken　together。

　　　　　The　law　which　secures　the　longest　leases　against　successors

of　every　kind　is；　so　far　as　I　know；　peculiar　to　Great　Britain。　It

was　introduced　into　Scotland　so　early　as　1449；　a　law　of　James　II。

Its　beneficial　influence；　however；　has　been　much　obstructed　by

entails；　the　heirs　of　entail　being　generally　restrained　from

letting　leases　for　any　long　term　of　years；　frequently　for　more

than　one　year。　A　late　Act　of　Parliament　has；　in　this　respect；

somewhat　slackened　their　fetters；　though　they　are　still　by　much

too　strait。　In　Scotland；　besides；　as　no　leasehold　gives　a　vote

for　a　Member　of　Parliament；　the　yeomanry　are　upon　this　account

less　respectable　to　their　landlords　than　in　England。

　　　　　In　other　parts　of　Europe；　after　it　was　found　convenient　to

secure　tenants　both　against　heirs　and　purchasers；　the　term　of

their　security　was　still　limited　to　a　very　short　period；　in

France；　for　example；　to　nine　years　from　the　commencement　of　the

lease。　It　has　in　that　country；　indeed；　been　lately　extended　to

twenty…seven；　a　period　still　too　short　to　encourage　the　tenant　to

make　the　most　important　improvements。　The　proprietors　of　land

were　anciently　the　legislators　of　every　part　of　Europe。　The　laws

relating　to　land；　therefore；　were　all　calculated　for　what　they

supposed　the　interest　of　the　proprietor。　It　was　for　his　interest；

they　had　imagined；　that　no　lease　granted　by　any　of　his

predecessors　should　hinder　him　from　enjoying；　during　a　long　term

of　years；　the　full　value　of　his　land。　Avarice　and　injustice　are

always　short…sighted；　and　they　did　not　foresee　how　much　this

regulation　must　obstruct　improvement；　and　thereby　hurt　in　the

long…run　the　real　interest　of　the　landlord。

　　　　　The　farmers　too；　besides　paying　the　rent；　were　anciently；　it

was　supposed；　bound　to　perform　a　great　number　of　services　to　the

landlord；　which　were　seldom　either　specified　in　the　lease；　or

regulated　by　any　precise　rule；　but　by　the　use　and　wont　of　the

manor　or　barony。　These　services；　therefore；　being　almost　entirely

arbitrary；　subjected　the　tenant　to　many　vexations。　In　Scotland

the　abolition　of　all　services　not　precisely　stipulated　in　the

lease　has　in　the　course　of　a　few　years　very　much　altered　for　the

better　the　condition　of　the　yeomanry　of　that　country。

　　　　　The　public　services　to　which　the　yeomanry　were　bound　were

not　less　arbitrary　than　the　private　ones。　To　make　and　maintain

the　high　roads；　a　servitude　which　still　subsists；　I　believe；

everywhere；　though　with　different　degrees　of　oppression　in

different　countries；　was　not　the　only　one。　When　the　king's

troops；　when　his　household　or　his　officers　of　any　kind　passed

through　any　part　of　the　country；　the　yeomanry　were　bound　to

provide　them　with　horses；　carriages；　and　provisions；　at　a　price

regulated　by　the　purveyor。　Great　Britain　is；　I　believe；　the　only

monarchy　in　Europe　where　the　oppression　of　purveyance　has　been

entirely　abolished。　It　still　subsists　in　France　and　Germany。

　　　　　The　public　taxes　to　which　they　were　subject　were　as

irregular　and　oppressive　as　the　services。　The　ancient　lords；

though　extremely　unwilling　to　grant　themselves　any　pecuniary　aid

to　their　sovereign；　easily　allowed　him　to　tallage；　as　they　called

it　their　tenants；　and　had　not　knowledge　enough　to　foresee　how

much　this　must　in　the　end　affect　their　own　revenue。　The　taille；

as　it　still　subsists　in　France；　may　serve　as　an　example　of　those

ancient　tallages。　It　is　a　tax　upon　the　supposed　profits　of　the

farmer；　which　they　estimate　by　the　stock　that　he　has　upon　the

farm。　It　is　his　interest；　therefore；　to　appear　to　have　as　little

as　possible；　and　consequently　to　employ　as　little　as　possible　in

its　cultivation；　and　none　in　its　improvement。　Should　any　stock

happen　to　accumulate　in　the　hands　of　a　French　farmer；　the　taille

is　almost　equal　to　a　prohibition　of　its　ever　being　employed　upon

the　land。　This　tax；　besides；　is　supposed　to　dishonour　whoever　is

subject　to　it；　and　to　degrade　him　below；　not　only　the　rank　of　a

gentleman；　but　that　of　a　burgher；　and　whoever　rents　the　lands　of

another　becomes　subject　to　it。　No　gentleman；　nor　even　any　burgher

who　has　stock；　will　submit　to　this　degradation。　This　tax；

therefore；　not　only　hinders　the　stock　which　accumulates　upon　the

land　from　being　employed　in　its　improvement；　but　drives　away　an

other　stock　from　it。　The　ancient　tenths　and　fifteenths；　so　usual

in　England　in　former　times；　seem；　so　far　as　they　affected　the

land；　to　have　been　taxes　of　the　same　nature　with　the　taille。

　　　　　Under　all　these　discouragements；　little　improvement　could　be

expected　from　the　occupiers　of　land。　That　order　of　people；　with

all　the　liberty　and　security　which　law　can　give；　must　always

improve　under　great　disadvantages。　The　farmer；　compared　with　the

proprietor；　is　as　a　merchant　who　trades　with　borrowed　money

compared　with　one　who　trades　with　his　own。　The　stock　of　both　may

improve；　but　that　of　the　one；　with　only　equal　good　conduct；　must

always　improve　more　slowly　than　that　of　the　other；　on　account　of

the　large　share　of　the　profits　which　is　consumed　by　the　interest

of　the　loan。　The　lands　cultivated　by　the　farmer　must；　in　the　same

manner；　with　only　equal　good　conduct；　be　improved　more　slowly

than　those　cultivated　by　the　proprietor；　on　account　of　the　large

share　of　the　produce　which　is　consumed　in　the　rent；　and　which；

had　the　farmer　been　proprietor；　he　might　have　employed　in　the

further　improvement　of　the　land。　The　station　of　a　farmer　besides

is；　from　the　nature　of　things；　inferior　to　that　of　a　proprietor。

Through　the　greater　part　of　Europe　the　yeomanry　are　regarded　as

an　inferior　rank　of　people；　even　to　the　better　sort　of　tradesmen

and　mechanics；　and　in　all　parts　of　Europe　to　the　great　merchants

and　master　manufacturers。　It　can　seldom　happen；　therefore；　that　a

man　of　any　considerable　stock　should　quit　the　superior　in　order

to　place　himself　in　an　inferior　station。　Even　in　the　present

state　of　Europe；　therefore；　little　stock　is　likely　to　go　from　any

other　profession　to　the　improvement　of　land　in　the　way　of

farming。　More　does　perhaps　in　Great　Britain　than　in　any　other

country；　though　even　there　the　great　stocks　which　are；　in　some

places；　employed　in　farming　have　generally　been　acquired　by

farming；　the　trade；　perhaps；　in　which　of　all　others　stock　is

commonly　acquired　most　slowly。　After　small　proprietors；　however；

rich　and　great　farmers　are；　in　every　country；　the　principal

improvers。　There　are　more　such　perhaps　in　England　than　in　any

other　European　monarchy。　In　the　republican　governments　of　Holland

and　of　Berne　in　Switzerland；　the　farmers　are　said　to　be　not

inferior　to　those　of　England。

　　　　　The　ancient　policy　of　Europe　was；　over　and　above　all　this；

unfavourable　to　the　improvement　and　cultivation　of　land；　whether

carried　on　by　the　proprietor　or　by　the　farmer；　first；　by　the

general　prohibition　of　the　exportation　of　corn　without　a　special

licence；　which　seems　to　have　been　a　very　universal　regulation；

and　secondly；　by　the　restraints　which　were　laid　upon　the　inland

commerce；　not　only　of　corn；　but　of　almost　every　other　part　of　the

produce　of　the　farm　by　the　absurd　laws　against　engrossers；

regrators；　and　forestallers；　and　by　the　privileges　of　fairs　and

markets。　It　has　already　been　observed　in　what　manner　the

prohibition　of　the　exportation　of　corn；　together　with　some

encouragement　given　to　the　importation　of　foreign　corn；

obstructed　the　cultivation　of　ancient　Italy；　naturally　the　most

fertile　country　in　Europe；　and　at　that　time　the　seat　of　the

greatest　empire　in　the　world。　To　what　degree　such　restraints　upon

the　inland　commerce　of　this　commodity；　joined　to　the　general

prohibition　of　exportation；　must　have　discouraged　the　cultivation

of　countries　less　fertile　and　less　favourably　circumstanced；　it

is　not　perhaps　ver