ÓÑÇéÌáʾ£ºÈç¹û±¾ÍøÒ³´ò¿ªÌ«Âý»òÏÔʾ²»ÍêÕû£¬Çë³¢ÊÔÊó±êÓÒ¼ü¡°Ë¢Ð¡±±¾ÍøÒ³£¡
Ó¢ÓïÄ£Ä⿼³¡10Ì×-µÚ2²¿·Ö
¿ì½Ý²Ù×÷: °´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ °´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ °´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿! Èç¹û±¾ÊéûÓÐÔĶÁÍ꣬ÏëÏ´μÌÐø½Ó×ÅÔĶÁ£¬¿ÉʹÓÃÉÏ·½ "Êղص½ÎÒµÄä¯ÀÀÆ÷" ¹¦ÄÜ ºÍ "¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©" ¹¦ÄÜ£¡
bers¡¡of¡¡his¡¡group¡£¡¡Such¡¡myths¡¡help¡¡to¡¡ward¡¡off¡¡feelings¡¡of¡¡isolations£»¡¡guilt£»¡¡anxiety£»¡¡and¡¡purposelessness¡¡¡ª¡¡in¡¡short£»¡¡they¡¡combat¡¡isolation¡¡and¡¡the¡¡breakdown¡¡of¡¡social¡¡standards¡¡and¡¡values¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡26¡£In¡¡the¡¡eyes¡¡of¡¡the¡¡author£»¡¡the¡¡greatest¡¡trouble¡¡with¡¡the¡¡US¡¡society¡¡may¡¡lie¡¡in¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡the¡¡nonª²existence¡¡of¡¡consensus¡¡on¡¡the¡¡forms¡¡of¡¡the¡¡society¡¡should¡¡take¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡the¡¡lack¡¡of¡¡divergence¡¡over¡¡the¡¡common¡¡organizations¡¡of¡¡social¡¡life¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡the¡¡nonª²acceptance¡¡of¡¡a¡¡society¡¡based¡¡on¡¡individual¡¡diversity¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡the¡¡pervasive¡¡distress¡¡caused¡¡by¡¡national¡¡morale¡¡decline¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡27¡£The¡¡asocial¡¡personality¡¡of¡¡Americans¡¡may¡¡stem¡¡from¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡the¡¡absence¡¡of¡¡a¡¡common¡¡religion¡¡and¡¡ancestry¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡the¡¡multiracial¡¡constituents¡¡of¡¡the¡¡US¡¡society¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡the¡¡want¡¡of¡¡a¡¡shared¡¡myths¡¡they¡¡possess¡¡in¡¡life¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡the¡¡counterbalance¡¡to¡¡narcissistic¡¡personality¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡28¡£Homer¡¯s¡¡epics¡¡is¡¡mentioned¡¡in¡¡Paragraph¡¡1¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡exemplify¡¡the¡¡contributions¡¡made¡¡by¡¡ancient¡¡poets¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡illustrate¡¡the¡¡role¡¡of¡¡shared¡¡fantasies¡¡about¡¡society¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡show¡¡an¡¡ideal¡¡stage¡¡of¡¡eternal¡¡social¡¡progress¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡make¡¡known¡¡myths¡¡of¡¡what¡¡a¡¡society¡¡ought¡¡to¡¡be¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡29¡£The¡¡author¡¡concludes¡¡that¡¡only¡¡shared¡¡myths¡¡can¡¡help¡¡Americans¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡to¡¡bring¡¡about¡¡the¡¡uniformity¡¡of¡¡their¡¡culture¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡to¡¡regain¡¡their¡¡consensus¡¡about¡¡a¡¡common¡¡experience¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡to¡¡stay¡¡away¡¡from¡¡negative¡¡feelings¡¡in¡¡their¡¡life¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡to¡¡counteract¡¡the¡¡effects¡¡of¡¡consensus¡¡about¡¡society¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡30¡£It¡¡can¡¡be¡¡inferred¡¡from¡¡Paragraph¡¡2¡¡that¡¡Christopher¡¡Lash¡¡is¡¡most¡¡probably¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡a¡¡reform¡¡advocate¡££§B£§¡¡a¡¡senior¡¡psychologist¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡a¡¡reputed¡¡poet¡££§D£§¡¡a¡¡social¡¡historian¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Text¡¡¡¡3¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡early¡¡retirement¡¡of¡¡experienced¡¡workers¡¡is¡¡seriously¡¡harming¡¡the¡¡U¡£S¡£¡¡economy£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡a¡¡new¡¡report¡¡from¡¡the¡¡Hudson¡¡Institute£»¡¡a¡¡public¡¡policy¡¡research¡¡organization¡£¡¡Currently£»¡¡many¡¡older¡¡experienced¡¡workers¡¡retire¡¡at¡¡an¡¡early¡¡age¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡the¡¡recently¡¡issued¡¡statistics£»¡¡79¡¡percent¡¡of¡¡qualified¡¡workers¡¡begin¡¡collecting¡¡retirement¡¡benefits¡¡at¡¡age¡¡62£»¡¡if¡¡that¡¡trend¡¡continues£»¡¡there¡¡will¡¡be¡¡a¡¡labor¡¡shortage¡¡that¡¡will¡¡hinder¡¡the¡¡economic¡¡growth¡¡in¡¡the¡¡twenty¡first¡¡century¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Older¡¡Americans¡¡constitute¡¡an¡¡increasing¡¡proportion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡population£»¡¡according¡¡to¡¡the¡¡U¡£¡¡S¡£¡¡Census¡¡Bureau£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡population¡¡of¡¡those¡¡over¡¡age¡¡65¡¡will¡¡grow¡¡by¡¡60£¥¡¡between¡¡2001¡¡and¡¡2020¡£¡¡During¡¡the¡¡same¡¡period£»¡¡the¡¡group¡¡aged¡¡18¡¡to¡¡44¡¡will¡¡increase¡¡by¡¡only¡¡4£¥¡£¡¡Keeping¡¡older¡¡skilled¡¡workers¡¡employed£»¡¡even¡¡part¡¡time£»¡¡would¡¡increase¡¡U¡£S¡£¡¡economic¡¡output¡¡and¡¡strengthen¡¡the¡¡tax¡¡base£»¡¡but¡¡without¡¡significant¡¡policy¡¡reforms£»¡¡massive¡¡early¡¡retirement¡¡among¡¡baby¡¡boomers¡¡seems¡¡more¡¡likely¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Retirement¡¡at¡¡age¡¡62¡¡is¡¡an¡¡economically¡¡rational¡¡decision¡¡today¡£¡¡Social¡¡Security¡¡and¡¡Medicaid¡¡earnings¡¡limits¡¡and¡¡tax¡¡penalties¡¡subject¡¡our¡¡most¡¡experienced¡¡workers¡¡to¡¡marginal¡¡tax¡¡rates¡¡as¡¡high¡¡as¡¡67£¥¡£¡¡Social¡¡Security¡¡formulas¡¡encourage¡¡early¡¡retirement¡£¡¡Although¡¡incomes¡¡usually¡¡rise¡¡with¡¡additional¡¡years¡¡of¡¡work£»¡¡any¡¡pay¡¡increases¡¡after¡¡the¡¡35¡year¡¡mark¡¡result¡¡in¡¡higher¡¡social¡¡Security¡¡taxes¡¡but¡¡only¡¡small¡¡increases¡¡in¡¡benefits¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Hudson¡¡Institute¡¡researchers¡¡believe¡¡that¡¡federal¡¡tax¡¡and¡¡benefit¡¡policies¡¡are¡¡at¡¡fault¡¡and¡¡reforms¡¡are¡¡urgently¡¡needed£»¡¡but¡¡they¡¡disagree¡¡with¡¡the¡¡popular¡¡proposal¡¡that¡¡much¡¡older¡¡Americans¡¡will¡¡have¡¡to¡¡work¡¡because¡¡Social¡¡Security¡¡will¡¡not¡¡support¡¡them¡¡and¡¡that¡¡baby¡¡boomers¡¡are¡¡not¡¡saving¡¡enough¡¡for¡¡retirement¡£¡¡According¡¡to¡¡the¡¡increase¡¡in¡¡401¡¡£¨k£©¡¡and¡¡Keogh¡¡retirement¡¡plans£»¡¡the¡¡ongoing¡¡stock¡¡market¡¡on¡¡Wall¡¡Street£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡likelihood¡¡of¡¡large¡¡inheritances£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡evidence¡¡that¡¡baby¡¡boomers¡¡will¡¡reach¡¡age¡¡65¡¡with¡¡greater¡¡financial¡¡assets¡¡than¡¡previous¡¡generations¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡Hudson¡¡institute¡¡advocates¡¡reforming¡¡government¡¡policies¡¡that¡¡now¡¡discourage¡¡work¡¡and¡¡savings£»¡¡especially¡¡for¡¡older¡¡worker¡£¡¡Among¡¡the¡¡report¡¯s¡¡recommendations£º¡¡Tax¡¡half¡¡of¡¡all¡¡Social¡¡Security¡¡benefits£»¡¡regardless¡¡of¡¡other¡¡income£»¡¡provide¡¡8£¥¡¡larger¡¡benefits¡¡for¡¡each¡¡year¡¡beyond¡¡65£»¡¡and¡¡permit¡¡workers¡¡nearing¡¡retirement¡¡to¡¡negotiate¡¡compensation¡¡packages¡¡that¡¡may¡¡include¡¡a¡¡lower¡¡salary¡¡but¡¡with¡¡greater¡¡healthcare¡¡benefits¡£¡¡However£»¡¡it¡¡may¡¡take¡¡real¡¡and¡¡fruitful¡¡planning¡¡to¡¡find¡¡the¡¡right¡¡solution¡¡to¡¡the¡¡early¡¡retirement¡¡of¡¡older¡¡experienced¡¡workers£»¡¡any¡¡measures¡¡taken¡¡must¡¡be¡¡allowed¡¡to¡¡prolong¡¡the¡¡serviceability¡¡of¡¡older¡¡experienced¡¡workers¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡31¡£According¡¡to¡¡Hudson¡¡Institute¡¡researchers£»¡¡the¡¡effect¡¡of¡¡the¡¡early¡¡retirement¡¡of¡¡qualified¡¡workers¡¡in¡¡the¡¡U¡£S¡£¡¡economy¡¡is¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡constructive¡£¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡significant¡£¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡inconclusive¡£¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡detrimental¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡32¡£The¡¡older¡¡experienced¡¡workers¡¡in¡¡America¡¡tend¡¡to¡¡retire¡¡early¡¡because¡¡their¡¡prolonged¡¡service¡¡may¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡do¡¡harm¡¡to¡¡younger¡¡generations¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡end¡¡up¡¡with¡¡few¡¡or¡¡no¡¡benefits¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡give¡¡play¡¡to¡¡their¡¡potentials¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡shed¡¡light¡¡on¡¡social¡¡trends¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡33¡£The¡¡second¡¡paragraph¡¡is¡¡written¡¡chiefly¡¡to¡¡show¡¡that¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡there¡¡will¡¡be¡¡an¡¡acute¡¡labor¡¡shortage¡¡in¡¡the¡¡near¡¡future¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡baby¡boomers¡¡contribute¡¡much¡¡to¡¡the¡¡US¡¡economic¡¡output¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡government¡¡policies¡¡concerning¡¡older¡¡people¡¡are¡¡out¡dated¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡older¡¡workers¡¡are¡¡enthusiastic¡¡about¡¡collecting¡¡social¡¡benefits¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡34¡£When¡¡mentioning¡¡¡°the¡¡ongoing¡¡stock¡¡market¡¡on¡¡Wall¡¡Street¡±£»¡¡the¡¡writer¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡is¡¡calling¡¡attention¡¡to¡¡the¡¡privileges¡¡to¡¡which¡¡baby¡boomers¡¡are¡¡entitled¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡is¡¡calling¡¡for¡¡the¡¡government¡¡to¡¡take¡¡countermeasures¡¡against¡¡labor¡¡shortage¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡is¡¡refuting¡¡a¡¡notion¡¡about¡¡experienced¡¡workers¡¯¡¡early¡¡retirement¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡is¡¡justifying¡¡the¡¡ineffectiveness¡¡of¡¡federal¡¡tax¡¡and¡¡benefit¡¡policies¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡35¡£Towards¡¡the¡¡issue£»¡¡what¡¡the¡¡writer¡¡is¡¡most¡¡concerned¡¡about¡¡will¡¡be¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡to¡¡advocate¡¡radically¡¡reforming¡¡government¡¡policies¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡to¡¡take¡¡into¡¡account¡¡the¡¡benefits¡¡upon¡¡retirement¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡to¡¡put¡¡in¡¡practice¡¡what¡¡Hudson¡¡researchers¡¡believe¡¡in¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡to¡¡prolong¡¡the¡¡practicability¡¡of¡¡older¡¡experienced¡¡employees¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Text¡¡¡¡4¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡history¡¡of¡¡responses¡¡to¡¡the¡¡work¡¡of¡¡the¡¡artist¡¡Sandro¡¡Botticelli¡¡£¨1444¡ª1510£©¡¡suggests¡¡that¡¡widespread¡¡appreciation¡¡by¡¡critics¡¡is¡¡a¡¡relatively¡¡recent¡¡phenomenon¡£¡¡Writing¡¡in¡¡1550£»¡¡Vasari¡¡expressed¡¡an¡¡unease¡¡with¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡work£»¡¡admitting¡¡that¡¡the¡¡artist¡¡fitted¡¡awkwardly¡¡into¡¡his¡¡evolutionary¡¡scheme¡¡of¡¡the¡¡history¡¡of¡¡art¡£¡¡Over¡¡the¡¡next¡¡two¡¡centuries£»¡¡academic¡¡art¡¡historians¡¡defamed¡¡Botticelli¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡his¡¡fellows¡¡Florentine£»¡¡Michelangelo¡£¡¡Even¡¡when¡¡antiª²academic¡¡art¡¡historians¡¡of¡¡the¡¡early¡¡nineteenth¡¡century¡¡rejected¡¡many¡¡of¡¡the¡¡standards¡¡of¡¡evaluation¡¡adopted¡¡by¡¡their¡¡predecessors£»¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡work¡¡remained¡¡outside¡¡of¡¡accepted¡¡taste£»¡¡pleasing¡¡neither¡¡amateur¡¡observers¡¡nor¡¡connoisseurs¡£¡¡£¨Many¡¡of¡¡his¡¡best¡¡paintings£»¡¡however£»¡¡remained¡¡hidden¡¡away¡¡in¡¡obscure¡¡churches¡¡and¡¡private¡¡homes¡££©¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡The¡¡primary¡¡reason¡¡for¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡unpopularity¡¡is¡¡not¡¡difficult¡¡to¡¡understand£º¡¡most¡¡observers£»¡¡up¡¡until¡¡the¡¡mid¡nineteenth¡¡century£»¡¡did¡¡not¡¡consider¡¡him¡¡to¡¡be¡¡noteworthy£»¡¡because¡¡his¡¡work£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡most¡¡part£»¡¡did¡¡not¡¡seem¡¡to¡¡these¡¡observers¡¡to¡¡exhibit¡¡the¡¡traditional¡¡characteristics¡¡of¡¡fifteenth¡century¡¡Florentine¡¡art¡£¡¡For¡¡example£»¡¡Botticelli¡¡rarely¡¡employed¡¡the¡¡technique¡¡of¡¡strict¡¡perspective¡¡and£»¡¡unlike¡¡Michelangelo£»¡¡never¡¡used¡¡chiaroscuro¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Another¡¡reason¡¡for¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡unpopularity¡¡may¡¡have¡¡been¡¡that¡¡his¡¡attitude¡¡toward¡¡the¡¡style¡¡of¡¡classical¡¡art¡¡was¡¡very¡¡different¡¡from¡¡that¡¡of¡¡his¡¡contemporaries¡£¡¡Although¡¡he¡¡was¡¡thoroughly¡¡exposed¡¡to¡¡classical¡¡art£»¡¡he¡¡showed¡¡little¡¡interest¡¡in¡¡borrowing¡¡from¡¡the¡¡classical¡¡style¡£¡¡Indeed£»¡¡it¡¡is¡¡paradoxical¡¡that¡¡a¡¡painter¡¡of¡¡large¡scale¡¡classical¡¡subjects¡¡adopted¡¡a¡¡style¡¡that¡¡was¡¡only¡¡slightly¡¡similar¡¡to¡¡that¡¡of¡¡classical¡¡art¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡In¡¡any¡¡case£»¡¡when¡¡viewers¡¡began¡¡to¡¡examine¡¡more¡¡closely¡¡the¡¡relationship¡¡of¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡work¡¡to¡¡the¡¡tradition¡¡of¡¡fifteenthª²century¡¡Florentine¡¡art£»¡¡his¡¡reputation¡¡began¡¡to¡¡grow¡£¡¡Analyses¡¡and¡¡assessments¡¡of¡¡Botticelli¡¡made¡¡between¡¡1850¡¡and¡¡1870¡¡by¡¡the¡¡artists¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Pre¡Raphaelite¡¡movement£»¡¡as¡¡well¡¡as¡¡by¡¡the¡¡writer¡¡Pater¡¡£¨although¡¡he£»¡¡unfortunately£»¡¡based¡¡his¡¡assessment¡¡on¡¡an¡¡incorrect¡¡analysis¡¡of¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡personality£©£»¡¡inspired¡¡a¡¡new¡¡appreciation¡¡of¡¡Botticelli¡¡throughout¡¡the¡¡English¡speaking¡¡world¡£¡¡Yet¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡work£»¡¡especially¡¡the¡¡Sistine¡¡frescoes£»¡¡did¡¡not¡¡generate¡¡worldwide¡¡attention¡¡until¡¡it¡¡was¡¡finally¡¡subjected¡¡to¡¡a¡¡comprehensive¡¡and¡¡scrupulous¡¡analysis¡¡by¡¡Home¡¡in¡¡1908¡£¡¡Home¡¡rightly¡¡demonstrated¡¡that¡¡the¡¡frescoes¡¡shared¡¡important¡¡features¡¡with¡¡paintings¡¡by¡¡other¡¡fifteenth¡century¡¡Florentines¡¡¡ª¡¡features¡¡such¡¡as¡¡skillful¡¡representation¡¡of¡¡anatomical¡¡proportions£»¡¡and¡¡of¡¡the¡¡human¡¡figure¡¡in¡¡motion¡£¡¡However£»¡¡Home¡¡argued¡¡that¡¡Botticelli¡¡did¡¡not¡¡treat¡¡these¡¡qualities¡¡as¡¡ends¡¡in¡¡themselves¡¡¡ª¡¡rather£»¡¡that¡¡he¡¡emphasized¡¡clear¡¡depletion¡¡of¡¡a¡¡story£»¡¡a¡¡unique¡¡achievement¡¡and¡¡one¡¡that¡¡made¡¡the¡¡traditional¡¡Florentine¡¡qualities¡¡less¡¡central¡£¡¡Because¡¡of¡¡Home¡¯s¡¡emphasis¡¡crucial¡¡to¡¡any¡¡study¡¡of¡¡art£»¡¡the¡¡twentieth¡¡century¡¡has¡¡come¡¡to¡¡appreciate¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡achievements¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡36¡£Which¡¡of¡¡the¡¡following¡¡would¡¡be¡¡the¡¡best¡¡title¡¡for¡¡the¡¡text£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡The¡¡Role¡¡of¡¡Standard¡¡Art¡¡Analyses¡¡and¡¡Appraisals¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡Sandro¡¡Botticelli£º¡¡From¡¡Rejection¡¡to¡¡Appreciation¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡The¡¡History¡¡of¡¡Critics¡¯¡¡Responses¡¡to¡¡Art¡¡Works¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡Botticelli¡¡and¡¡Florentine£º¡¡A¡¡Comparative¡¡Study¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡37¡£We¡¡can¡¡learn¡¡from¡¡the¡¡text¡¡that¡¡art¡¡critics¡¡have¡¡a¡¡history¡¡of¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡suppressing¡¡painters¡¯¡¡art¡¡initiatives¡££§B£§¡¡favoring¡¡a¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡best¡¡paintings¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡rejecting¡¡traditional¡¡art¡¡characteristics¡££§D£§¡¡undervaluing¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡achievements¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡38¡£The¡¡views¡¡of¡¡Vasari¡¡and¡¡Home¡¡on¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡products¡¡are¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡identical¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡complementary¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡opposite¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡similar¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡39¡£The¡¡word¡¡¡°connoisseurs¡±¡¡£¨Paragraph¡¡1£©¡¡most¡¡probably¡¡means¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡representatives¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Pre¡Raphaelite¡¡Movement¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§B£§¡¡people¡¡who¡¡are¡¡in¡¡favor¡¡of¡¡Florentine¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡critics¡¡who¡¡are¡¡likely¡¡to¡¡make¡¡assessments¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§D£§¡¡conservatives¡¡clinging¡¡to¡¡classical¡¡art¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡40¡£What¡¡does¡¡the¡¡author¡¡think¡¡of¡¡Botticelli¡¯s¡¡representation¡¡skills£¿¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§A£§¡¡They¡¡are¡¡to¡¡be¡¡fully¡¡appreciated¡££§B£§¡¡They¡¡evolve¡¡from¡¡an¡¡uncertain¡¡source¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡£§C£§¡¡They¡¡underlie¡¡his¡¡personality¡££§D£§¡¡They¡¡conform¡¡to¡¡the¡¡classical¡¡style¡£¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡
¿ì½Ý²Ù×÷: °´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ °´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ °´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿!
ÎÂÜ°Ìáʾ£º ο´Ð¡ËµµÄͬʱ·¢±íÆÀÂÛ£¬Ëµ³ö×Ô¼ºµÄ¿´·¨ºÍÆäËüС»ï°éÃÇ·ÖÏíÒ²²»´íŶ£¡·¢±íÊéÆÀ»¹¿ÉÒÔ»ñµÃ»ý·ÖºÍ¾Ñé½±Àø£¬ÈÏÕæдԴ´ÊéÆÀ ±»²ÉÄÉΪ¾«ÆÀ¿ÉÒÔ»ñµÃ´óÁ¿½ð±Ò¡¢»ý·ÖºÍ¾Ñé½±ÀøŶ£¡